Being Happy amid Catastrophe: Social Nihilism and the Inversion of Happiness in Central Africa

Abstract

This article analyses a trend observable in some contemporary African societies, particularly Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo: the gradual accommodation of collective consciousness to political, social and moral deterioration, to the point that collective failure becomes familiar and may even become a source of pride. This phenomenon differs from Afro-pessimism. It refers to the weakening of a society’s collective ability to judge reality according to shared normative demands.

In Central Africa, and more particularly in Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, misfortune is becoming ‘habitable’. It no longer necessarily prompts a demand for transformation but, on the contrary, forms of resignation, justification, defensive irony or paradoxical celebration. Disaster has become incorporated into the ordinary horizon of social existence.

The hypothesis defended here is that this social nihilism takes the form of an inversion of happiness. Societies no longer call themselves happy because they live well, but because they have learned to call their ability to survive in an environment that diminishes and destroys them ‘happiness’. This false happiness, distinct from genuine joy, is instead a psychological, cultural and political adaptation to debasement. It therefore neutralises criticism, devalues the demand for change and turns historical determinism into a spontaneous philosophy of collective existence.

The article also examines how this mental arrangement helps explain the enthusiasm generated among a large part of public opinion in Central African countries by the political experiments of Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso. Fascination with sovereigntist regimes reveals a need for symbolic compensation more than a rigorous assessment of their results. It expresses a legitimate desire to break with the postcolony, but also leads to the problematic substitution of a discourse of power for an effective evaluation of political reality.

Keywords

Social nihilism; Afro-pessimism; Central Africa; Cameroon; Democratic Republic of the Congo; inversion of happiness; the good life; collective consciousness; sovereigntism; determinism; political crisis; postcolony.

Introduction

In some African states, such as Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the protracted political crisis, worn-out institutions, persistent poverty and lack of any collective prospect seem to have produced a singular state of social consciousness: the worse things become, the more part of society appears to recognise itself in them, adapt to them and sometimes even derive a strange form of satisfaction from them.

This satisfaction is neither the expression of a fulfilled life, the sign of regained dignity nor the manifestation of collective freedom. It belongs instead to a process of inversion: what should provoke shame, indignation, revolt or critical examination becomes material for laughter, folklore, justification or identification. Catastrophe is no longer regarded as an anomaly, but as the very environment of social existence. People no longer genuinely seek to escape it. They learn to live in it, and sometimes even laugh about it, as though this familiarity with debasement were proof of wisdom or authenticity.

To put it deliberately bluntly, one might say that many people, including political leaders and intellectuals, have come to worship ‘savagery’. The word is shocking, but it conveys something that more polished concepts risk neutralising. Savagery does not designate material poverty alone. It designates the decomposition of society, the collapse of its norms, the banalisation of indignity and the naturalisation of misfortune.

This is the phenomenon that the present article proposes to call ‘social nihilism’, in a sense close to Emmanuel Todd’s use of ‘nihilism’ when he analyses the Western crisis as a loss of religious, moral and collective substance. For Todd, nihilism is not merely a philosophical opinion. More fundamentally, it describes an absence of purpose, a profound disorganisation of values and societies’ inability to give themselves a coherent horizon.

Transposed to African societies in crisis, nihilism does not refer to destructive over-power, but to an internalised powerlessness that is itself profoundly destructive. It is not necessarily directed towards the physical destruction of oneself or the world. It can even coexist with an apparent ‘joy of living’ made up of laughter, dance, hospitality, celebration and mutual aid.

This African nihilism is therefore not identical to the Western nihilism diagnosed by Emmanuel Todd. It is not the product of material saturation, terminal individualism or the disappearance of former religious matrices within affluent societies. On the contrary, it arises in societies marked by scarcity, domination, deprivation and broken promises. It emerges from the repeated experience of a modernity that has been deferred, confiscated or imitated. It is not the nihilism of excess, but that of exhaustion.

The contribution of this article is therefore to extend Emmanuel Todd’s nihilist hypothesis: material saturation can produce nihilism, but the lasting deprivation of the minimum conditions of a good life can also engender social nihilism. In the first case, emptiness arises from excess; in the African case, it arises from absolute deprivation.

The nihilism threatening some African states—of which Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo are emblematic cases—does not come from societies that no longer know what to do with their abundance, but from societies that have spent too long learning to survive without believing in the possibility of a dignified life.

The aim of this article is threefold: first, to distinguish social nihilism from Afro-pessimism understood as a negative representation of Africa; second, to show how this nihilism produces an inversion of happiness in which endurance in the face of misfortune replaces the demand for social transformation; and finally, to analyse how this state of mind illuminates the sometimes excessive and uncritical celebration of certain West African political experiments, particularly those of Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso.

1. From Afro-pessimism to social nihilism

In common usage, Afro-pessimism describes a representation of Africa centred on poverty, war, corruption, disease, recurring political crises and the supposed inability of African states to master their destiny. It turns these difficulties into essential attributes of Africa rather than historical, political or economic phenomena. Africa then appears condemned to failure, as echoed both by René Dumont’s False Start in Africa and Nicolas Sarkozy’s Dakar speech, which implicitly presents Africa as trapped in a deficient relationship with history.

This representation has rightly been denounced as an heir to the colonial imagination. It reduces Africa to its shortcomings and treats its difficulties as natural properties, overlooking the continent’s social dynamics, resistance, popular inventions, intellectual creations, informal economies, community solidarities and vitality.

Social nihilism does not merely consist in thinking that Africa is doing badly, but in no longer expecting it to do otherwise. Afro-pessimism describes or exaggerates failure; social nihilism inhabits it, adapts to it and turns it into a norm of life.

The distinction is essential. As long as misfortune is perceived as such, it can become the starting point of criticism. A society aware of domination may seek liberation; one aware of poverty may seek to produce differently. But when misfortune becomes identity, poverty destiny and domination a total explanation, criticism loses its force. Misfortune no longer provokes thought; it engulfs it.

Social nihilism thus begins where the negative no longer prompts negation: where corruption no longer causes indignation, injustice no longer scandalises and failure no longer creates a demand for reform—where these matters merely sustain conversation.

2. The inversion of happiness

In a politically and morally ordered society, happiness presupposes minimum objective conditions: security, dignity, health, education, the possibility of work, recognition and an ability to imagine the future. It is not reducible to material comfort, but requires that human life not remain constantly exposed to arbitrariness and uncertainty.

In societies damaged over the long term, happiness may change meaning. It may cease to be connected to fulfilment and become a mere capacity for survival. People are no longer happy because the world is habitable, but because they have learned to survive in an uninhabitable world. Happiness then refers not to the quality of existence, but to the ability to endure its deterioration.

Life is no longer understood as qualitatively differentiated. The traditional distinction between surviving, living and living well disappears. Human life is reduced to its most elementary dimension and loses what makes it properly human: the demand for dignity, freedom, meaning, justice and fulfilment. The danger is that the good life can no longer be distinguished from mere survival.

This inversion appears in ordinary language. Expressions celebrating resourcefulness, cunning, endurance and the ability to ‘manage’ or ‘hustle’ are admirable when they bear witness to creativity under difficult conditions. They become disturbing when they replace every demand for justice. A society cannot celebrate the resourcefulness of the poor without questioning the structures that condemn them to rely upon it, nor turn citizens’ endurance into an excuse for rulers’ irresponsibility.

Societies of anaesthetising laughter

Laughter abounds in African societies in crisis. It is often a survival resource that defuses fear, names the absurd and creates community amid disorder. Although it may be resistance, it may also become anaesthetic. By laughing repeatedly about electricity that never comes, scarce water, an extortionate administration, collapsing schools, hospitals that kill, police officers who demand bribes and politicians who lie, people eventually turn into comedy what should remain intolerable.

The problem is not laughter itself, but the moment when it becomes a social technology for absorbing the unacceptable. It then ceases to open a critical distance within reality. It no longer liberates, reveals or prepares for change. Instead, it domesticates citizens, neutralises their capacity for indignation and replaces revolt with a merely aesthetic state.

3. The Aristotelian inversion: when happiness becomes detached from the good life

The inversion of happiness challenges a philosophical intuition expressed with particular precision by Aristotle.

In the Nicomachean Ethics, happiness—eudaimonia—does not mean mere subjective satisfaction, still less psychological compensation. It refers to the fulfilment of human life according to its proper purpose. It is not simply feeling good. It presupposes a good life: an existence guided by virtue, reason, measure and dignity, in which human beings can fully realise what they are.

For Aristotle, happiness is profoundly related to a fulfilled life. A happy person does not merely endure existence, but leads a life worthy of being chosen for its own sake. Happiness is not survival; it is the successful activity of a human life in accordance with its proper excellence, and consequently requires minimum moral, political and social conditions.

This social dimension is decisive because Aristotle’s conception of happiness cannot be separated from humanity’s political condition. Happiness is not only the quality of an individual life; it depends on the common world in which that life unfolds—on how people live together, recognise one another, deliberate, establish rules and organise dignified existence.

The city therefore exists not merely to allow people to live, but to allow them to live well together. Happiness is not purely private: it involves collective life, political organisation and a quality of social relations without which human life is reduced to self-preservation.

Contemporary social nihilism breaks this equation by separating happiness from the good life. Societies no longer call themselves happy because they live well, but because they have learned to survive a diminished life. Happiness becomes a symptom of adaptation to scarcity, corruption, fear, the absence of prospects and institutional decay. The supposedly happy person is the one who adapts to the very phenomena that prevent the good life.

A society may therefore call ‘happiness’ what is really habituation to debasement, and celebrate as collective strength what stems from its political inability to transform reality. Inverted happiness does not deny suffering; it makes it habitable. It does not remove catastrophe; it converts it into the ordinary scenery of existence.

This is an anthropological and political crisis, concerning not only individual feelings but the definition of a desirable human life. If a society no longer distinguishes survival from the good life, endurance from freedom or adaptation from dignity, it gradually loses the ability to judge its own condition. It may still laugh, sing, dance, vote, comment and vaguely hope, but it has relinquished the fundamental demand underlying genuine politics: the right to live differently.

The point is therefore not merely to denounce false happiness, but to restore the difference between living and living well. Social nihilism begins when survival becomes proclaimed happiness and diminished life ceases to be perceived as mutilation.

Where Aristotle conceived happiness as the activity of a fulfilled life, social nihilism produces a compensatory, defensive and low-intensity happiness, born not of the fullness of existence but of collectively learning to accept its reduction.

4. The celebration of collective determinism

It is often said in Africa that things are as they are because they cannot be otherwise. Colonial history, foreign interference, international financial institutions, predatory elites, tribalism, poverty, ignorance and corruption are invoked as absolute explanations. This article does not deny the historical causes of the African crisis. Colonisation, predatory economics, structural adjustment, international complicity, Françafrique, imposed or sustained wars, territorial partitions, externally oriented economies and monetary dependency have profoundly affected African trajectories. Serious thought about Africa must account for them; criticism that ignored them would lapse into abstract moralism or facile blame of dominated peoples.

Each factor may be relevant, but their accumulation eventually has a paralysing effect. Everything explains everything, and this very saturation of explanation sometimes prevents thought about action in Africa.

Recognising historical determinations does not mean turning them into fatality. A cause is not a destiny, a constraint is not an essence and an inheritance is not a sentence. Social nihilism begins precisely when explanation becomes excuse, when the memory of domination closes every horizon and prevents alternative thought, and when denouncing the past demands nothing of the present.

Celebrating determinisms is especially dangerous because it gives resignation the appearance of absolute knowledge. It amounts to saying that nothing can change because the dominant forces always win.

Such a representation strips history of its character as a field of struggles and turns it into a metaphysical prison.

Critical African thought must reconcile two demands: never absolve the systems of domination that produced the continent’s debasement, but never make them an alibi for powerlessness. Victimhood may be a historical truth; it becomes dangerous when transformed into a definitive political identity.

5. Intellectuals and the rationalisation of disaster

African intellectuals—particularly those in Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo—might be expected to keep their societies’ critical capacity alive. Their role is not merely to comment on reality, but to prevent degraded reality from becoming the sole measure of what is possible. Yet some of them, whether explicitly, through caution or from weariness, participate in rationalising the disaster afflicting their states.

This rationalisation takes several forms. Some turn institutional failure into cultural singularity. Others present corruption as informal redistribution. Still others explain authoritarianism by the need for order, administrative mediocrity by the constraints of history, the absence of rights by the primacy of community, or economic powerlessness solely by external responsibility. In every case, thought abandons its critical mission and becomes an activity of justification.

The African intellectual’s social position should not be idealised. Intellectuals also belong to the society that produces them and endure its constraints, fears, seductions and dependencies. Their responsibility nonetheless remains distinctive, precisely because their conceptual tools should prevent them from confusing explanation with justification.

One role of the intellectual is to keep open the difference between explaining and accepting. Explaining why a state collapses is not accepting its collapse. Explaining why corruption spreads is not normalising it. Explaining why populations adapt is not turning adaptation into a political ideal. When this difference disappears, the intellectual becomes the learned high priest of collective resignation, lending theoretical dignity to what should remain an object of concern, criticism and transformation.

Many African states, particularly in Central Africa, thus witness a perversion of the critical function. Instead of opening the social imagination, some intellectuals close it down. Instead of making reality debatable, they make it necessary. Instead of opening possibilities, they teach that change is impossible, naïve or dangerous. Social nihilism is therefore also intellectual nihilism: it destroys not only values, but the very ability to demand them.

6. Fascination with Sahelian political experiments

Enthusiasm for the political experiments of Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso must be analysed within this framework. These countries are developing a discourse of rupture with the prevailing regional and international order. They denounce French-speaking countries’ dependency on France, challenge ECOWAS, claim recovered sovereignty and offer a new political grammar founded on dignity, security and independence.

It would be intellectually lazy to despise this enthusiasm. It expresses African peoples’ fatigue with formal democracies that produce no social transformation, exasperation at the condescension of some Western countries, rejection of postcolonial mechanisms and anger at civilian elites often regarded as corrupt, ineffective or disconnected. The popularity of these Sahelian experiments therefore arises from immense historical frustration.

Yet legitimate frustration becomes dangerous when it suspends all critical judgement. Rupture is insufficient if the space it opens is not filled by a genuine institutional project. Denouncing former dependencies guarantees nothing unless just, effective and accountable institutions replace those being challenged. Sovereigntist discourse does not automatically produce a strong state close to its citizens and capable of meeting social needs sustainably. Anti-imperialism may be necessary; it is never sufficient.

Social nihilism appears precisely when symbol replaces the test of reality, when discourse matters more than its effects and when the image of power becomes more desirable than the patient construction of real power. Spectacular sovereignty relieves the imagination; actual sovereignty transforms everyday life.

7. Cameroon and the DRC: two laboratories of habituation to disaster

Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo each offer significant examples of collective habituation to disaster. They must not be confused: their histories, territorial structures, resources, conflicts and political trajectories differ profoundly. But they share the experience of a protracted crisis.

In Cameroon, political stability has often been presented as a virtue in itself. Yet it conceals institutional immobility and a closed political arena, at the centre of which are a deadly Anglophone crisis, endemic corruption, young people without prospects, a cumbersome administration, a poorly inclusive economy and a public imagination saturated with fear, caution and cynicism. Cameroonian society has learned not to expect too much from the state. It circumvents it, distrusts public speech and often prefers cunning to the impersonal application of rules.

In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the vast territory, mineral wealth, weakness of the state, wars in the East, internal and external predation, regional interventions, armed violence and institutional instability have produced another form of general exhaustion. Too many deaths, reports left without effect, broken promises, disputed elections, confiscated riches and international speeches: repeated tragedy has generated widespread moral fatigue.

In both countries, collective consciousness now seems to live in a form of desperate irony. Much of the population knows that the country is doing badly, but this knowledge no longer necessarily produces collective action. It becomes circular knowledge—repeated, commented upon, mocked and absorbed. Lucidity therefore tends to become powerless. Powerless lucidity may become nihilistic: it sees, understands and explains a great deal, but no longer believes that the situation can genuinely be overcome.

The people of these two countries are not naïve. They often understand what is failing better than outside experts. But without a political outlet, this knowledge turns into humour, cynicism, fatalism or celebration of survival. Collective consciousness does not necessarily lack intelligence; it lacks a horizon.

8. Towards a non-despairing critique of African nihilism

The point is not to reproach people for their endurance, humour, ability to survive or creativity in the face of scarcity. That would be unjust and morally indecent. African societies have often had to invent admirable forms of life in conditions that others could not have endured.

The criticism developed here concerns the moment when survival becomes ideology, adaptation replaces aspiration and endurance provides an alibi for political irresponsibility; when humour becomes social anaesthesia, denunciation of the West absolves local predators, and verbal sovereigntism replaces the construction of effective sovereignty.

A non-despairing critique of social nihilism must reject two symmetrical positions: Afro-pessimist contempt, which sees African crises as proof of historical incapacity, and nihilistic self-celebration, which turns those crises into authenticity, destiny or moral superiority. Between them lies a difficult position: recognising the depth of the disaster without allowing it the final word.

One fundamental task of contemporary African thought is to make misfortune visible as misfortune once again—not by cultivating permanent complaint, but by restoring the capacity to judge every situation. A society can transform itself only if it can say what is not normal, what is unacceptable and what cannot be surrendered to destiny.

Conclusion

Social nihilism does not always appear as explicit despair. As in Africa, it may take smiling, ironic, festive, patriotic or sovereigntist forms. It may speak the language of popular wisdom, resourcefulness, wounded dignity or historical revenge. This is precisely what makes it difficult to identify.

The inversion of happiness describes this shift. People are no longer happy because life is good; they call themselves happy because they have learned to survive a diminished life. This inverted happiness may appear to be a psychological victory over despair, but it becomes a political defeat when it neutralises the demand to transform society. A society content merely to survive eventually forgets that it has the right to live differently.

The challenge facing Africa is therefore not only political. It is anthropological, moral and intellectual. It concerns a society’s capacity to keep alive the idea of a dignified life. It opens the possibility of thinking Africa as something other than an eternal victim, a habitual catastrophe or a theatre of symbolic revenge. Finally, it engages the responsibility of intellectuals: not to sanctify spectacular ruptures, but patiently to reopen the horizon of possibility.

Being happy amid catastrophe is not proof of wisdom. It is the symptom of a world that confuses survival with dignity. The first critical task is therefore to unlearn this false happiness—not in order to sink into pessimism, but to restore society’s strength to desire something other than its own adaptation to disaster.

Indicative bibliography — Philosophical sources: happiness, the good life, revolt and nihilism

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translation and presentation by Richard Bodéüs. Paris: GF Flammarion, 2004.

Aristotle. Politics. Translation and presentation by Pierre Pellegrin. Paris: GF Flammarion, 1993.

Camus, Albert. The Rebel. Paris: Gallimard, 1951.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Gay Science. Translation by Patrick Wotling. Paris: GF Flammarion, 2007.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Translation by Georges-Arthur Goldschmidt. Paris: Le Livre de Poche, 1972.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. Posthumous Fragments. Paris: Gallimard, 1977–1997.

Todd, Emmanuel. The Defeat of the West. Paris: Gallimard, 2024.

Domination, resignation and social criticism

Bourdieu, Pierre. The Weight of the World. Paris: Seuil, 1993.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Pascalian Meditations. Paris: Seuil, 1997.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Language and Symbolic Power. Paris: Seuil, 2001.

La Boétie, Étienne de. Discourse on Voluntary Servitude. Paris: GF Flammarion, 1993.

Weber, Max. Science as a Vocation and Politics as a Vocation. Paris: Plon, 1959.

Weber, Max. Economy and Society. Paris: Plon, 1971.

Colonisation, the postcolony and critical African thought

Césaire, Aimé. Discourse on Colonialism. Paris: Présence Africaine, 1955.

Fanon, Frantz. Black Skin, White Masks. Paris: Seuil, 1952.

Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Paris: François Maspero, 1961.

Mbembe, Achille. On the Postcolony: Essay on the Political Imagination in Contemporary Africa. Paris: Karthala, 2000.

Mbembe, Achille. Out of the Dark Night: Essays on Decolonization. Paris: La Découverte, 2010.

Mudimbe, V. Y. The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.

Sarr, Felwine. Afrotopia. Paris: Philippe Rey, 2016.

State, political crisis and social imaginaries in Africa

Bayart, Jean-François. The State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly. Paris: Fayard, 1989.

Bayart, Jean-François, Stephen Ellis and Béatrice Hibou. The Criminalization of the State in Africa. Brussels: Complexe, 1997.

Chabal, Patrick, and Jean-Pascal Daloz. Africa Works: Disorder as Political Instrument. Oxford: James Currey, 1999.

Hibou, Béatrice. The Force of Obedience: The Political Economy of Repression in Tunisia. Paris: La Découverte, 2006.

Mbembe, Achille. Politiques de l’inimitié. Paris: La Découverte, 2016.

Tonda, Joseph. Le Souverain moderne: Le corps du pouvoir en Afrique centrale (Congo, Gabon). Paris: Karthala, 2005.

Afro-pessimism, sovereignty and imaginaries of rupture

Diop, Cheikh Anta. Les Fondements économiques et culturels d’un État fédéral d’Afrique noire. Paris: Présence Africaine, 1960.

Ki-Zerbo, Joseph. À quand l’Afrique? Interview with René Holenstein. Paris: Éditions de l’Aube, 2003.

Mbembe, Achille. Critique of Black Reason. Paris: La Découverte, 2013.

Monga, Célestin. Nihilisme et négritude: Les arts de vivre en Afrique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009.

Sarr, Felwine. Habiter le monde: Essai de politique relationnelle. Montreal: Mémoire d’encrier, 2017.